Using Zend_Acl with your model
Zend_Acl is an excellent component that provides Access Control List (ACL) functionality. In most cases the goal is to manage user access to resources. access to to manage all things related to user access. In a nutshell, a role
to any kind of resource. But unfortunate it doesn't quite live up to its full potential just yet, due to a few implementation details as outlined in tickets and ZF-4460. The latter of the two also has comments that include a few examples for a workaround.
I'm using the following class which gives any custom Assert object access to the actual Resource passed to it.
/**
* The current Zend_Acl design does not allow for
* using a custom Role and Resource objects and expect that they'll make it through
* to custom assertions.
* See http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-1722
* and http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-4460
*/
class My_Acl extends Zend_Acl
{
/**
* Returns the identified Resource
*
* The $resource parameter can either be a Resource or a Resource identifier.
*
* @param Zend_Acl_Resource_Interface|string $resource
* @throws Zend_Acl_Exception
* @return Zend_Acl_Resource_Interface
*/
public function get($resource)
{
if (!$this->has($resource)) {
require_once 'Zend/Acl/Exception.php';
throw new Zend_Acl_Exception("Resource '$resource' not found");
}
if ($resource instanceof Zend_Acl_Resource_Interface) {
return $resource;
}
return $this->_resources[$resource]['instance'];
}
}
Unfortunately, this doesn't fix the issue of the Role making it through to an assertion, but in most of my cases that's the acting user anyway, so I don't even try to grab the passed in $role and instead use the identity straight from Zend_Auth.
/**
* Ensure the photo is owned by the user with $role
*
*/
class PhotoOwnerAssertion implements Zend_Acl_Assert_Interface
{
public function assert(Zend_Acl $acl,
Zend_Acl_Role_Interface $role = null,
Zend_Acl_Resource_Interface $resource = null,
$privilege = null)
{
if (!$resource instanceof Photos_Row) {
return false;
}
/* @var $resource Photos_Row */
/*
* Workaround; the current Zend_Acl design does not allow for
* using a custom Role interface and expect that it'll make it through.
* See http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-1722 and
* http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-4460
*/
$role = Zend_Auth::getInstance()->getIdentity();
return $resource->getOwnerId() == $role;
}
}
When setting up the ACL, I provide an instance of the custom assertion which will then provide the proper access control. It's fairly well encapsulated (other than the bug workarounds).
/**
* Only allow owners to view, edit, and delete their photos
*/
$acl->allow('member', 'Photo', array('view', 'edit', 'delete'), new PhotoOwnerAssertion());
In this case, the Photos_Row class must also provide a getOwnerId() method.
class Photos_Row extends Zend_Db_Table_Row_Abstract
implements Zend_Acl_Resource_Interface
{
/**
* Resource type (for use with ACL)
*
* @see Zend_Acl_Resource_Interface
*
* @return string
*/
public function getResourceId()
{
return 'Photo';
}
/**
* Return the photo owner's UUID
*
* @see UgcItem
*
* @return string
*/
public function getOwnerId()
{
return $this->avataruuid;
}
}
A little more abstraction and the custom assertion can be used for models other than photos.
Print This Post
Proper Twitter Integration with Zend Framework
Twitter is all the rage these days. Every site out there has some kind of "Tweet This" link or "Follow us on Twitter" button. Some sites have even deeper integration and tweet events on your behalf. In most cases, those sites are asking you for your Twitter username and password. What? Even scarier, many people enter their credentials without thinking twice. It's crazy. When has it become acceptable to enter your credentials for your online accounts (that often make you choose six or more character passwords) into some random third party site? Well, the answer, I suppose, is since social networking sites have began asking for email account access to rummage through your contact list. Still, it's a rather unacceptable solution for a self-respecting web site to operate this way, especially since Twitter supports the OAuth protocol which is designed to tackle this exact problem.
If you're familiar with how Flickr allows third-party applications and websites access to your account, then you know how it works. A web site requests access to your account, you are prompted to allow and deny access, and that's it. There are no passwords involved. And if you decide that you don't like what that website is doing with your account, you can revoke access at any time.
I will assume that you're already familiar with the Zend Framework. If that is not the case, and you're a PHP developer, you should really consider starting to use it. It is a very well designed and powerful collection of classes that complement each other and, after the initial ramp up time and learning curve, will pay off in both terms of development speed as well as maintainability. Check out the Quick Start.
In fact, Zend Framework (1.8) ships with a Zend_Service_Twitter class, which provides all the Twitter functionality. The problem is that this class only supports Basic Authentication using your Twitter account username and password. But fear not, we can bend this class to do our bidding.
See, underneath the hood, Zend_Service_Twitter is actually a Zend_Rest_Client, which is powered by Zend_Http_Client. Let's just remember that for now.
Let's take a look at this OAuth thing. Zend Framework has some preliminary support for it in the incubator. The client portion of it is functional, although kind of buggy, still.
The proposal for Zend_Oauth can be found here http://framework.zend.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=37957, complete with a ma.gnolia.com example use case.
Let me summarize how this works real quick:
1. Your configured Zend_Oauth_Consumer fetches a request token, which is used to prompt the user of the service to allow access.
2. Once access is allowed, your application receives an access token.
3. Your can ask the access token object to hand you an http client. It's a Zend_Oauth_Client, which extends Zend_Http_Client, and automagically handles the signing so you can treat it like a regular Zend_Http_Client and perform all the GETS and POSTS you want. Nifty!
Now let's go back to the Zend_Service_Twitter. Remember how it uses a Zend_Http_Client? All we have to do now is remove the basic (username/password) authentication mechanism and replace it with the OAuth-based version. To achieve that, we'll simply extend Zend_Service_Twitter as My_Service_Twitter. and make the following changes:
class My_Service_Twitter extends Zend_Service_Twitter
{
/**
* @var array
*/
protected $_oauthOptions;
/**
* @var Zend_Oauth_Token_Access
*/
protected $_accessToken;
/**
* Initialize Oauth
*/
protected function _init()
{
if (!$this->_authInitialized) {
$client = $this->_accessToken->getHttpClient($this->_oauthOptions);
$client->setHeaders('Accept-Charset', 'ISO-8859-1,utf-8');
self::setHttpClient($client);
$this->_authInitialized = true;
}
$client = self::getHttpClient();
$client->resetParameters();
}
/**
* @param array $oauthOptions
* @return My_Service_Twitter provides fluent interface
*/
public function setOauthOptions(array $oauthOptions)
{
$this->_oauthOptions = $oauthOptions;
return $this;
}
/**
* @return array
*/
public function getOauthOptions()
{
return $this->_oauthOptions;
}
/**
* @param Zend_Oauth_Token_Access $token
* @return My_Service_Twitter provides fluent interface
*/
public function setToken(Zend_Oauth_Token_Access $token)
{
$this->_accessToken = $token;
return $this;
}
/**
* @return Zend_Oauth_Token_Access
*/
public function getToken()
{
return $this->_accessToken;
}
}
And it's ready to be used. Instantiate the class, set the Oauth token via setToken() and then use the class the same way as before.
Print This Post
Categories
- Android
- Database
- Development
- Entertainment
- Gaming
- Hardware
- PHP
- Second Life
- Social Web
- Software & Tools
- Uncategorized
- Virtual Worlds
- Zend Framework
Archives
- January 2012
- May 2011
- March 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- February 2008
- December 2007
- August 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- March 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- June 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- March 2004